Tuesdays With Morrie Essay, Research Paper
Life & # 8217 ; s Greatest Lesson
Morrie Schwartz was an intelligent, interesting senior citizen that touched
a batch of people, particularly Mitch Albom. Morrie passed on a batch of his cognition
in the last few months of his life, due to amyotrophic lareral induration ( ALS ) . This
paper will touch on Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrine of life, what he says is of import and
valuable, and besides the battles and jobs of life. I will besides compare
Morrie & # 8217 ; s message with other doctrines and besides give my sentiment about
Morrie & # 8217 ; s theory of human nature and doctrine of life.
Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrine of life is full of many thoughts and to better understand it
it & # 8217 ; s easier to interrupt it down into parts. One of the doctrines was to care for
household and to be more unfastened about your emotions so that you will non repent it
when you or a loved one dies. Another one of Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrines is to be
unfastened to forgiveness the undermentioned quotation mark shows how Morrie regrets non forgiving
one of his closest friends. & # 8220 ; Over the old ages, I met Norman a few times and he
ever tried to accommodate, but I didn & # 8217 ; t accept it. I wasn & # 8217 ; t satisfied with his
account. I was disdainful. Mitch & # 8230 ; a few old ages ago & # 8230 ; he died of malignant neoplastic disease. I ne’er
got to forgive him & # 8221 ; ( Albom p. 166 ) . That quotation mark showed how Morrie profoundly
declinations non forgiving his friend, for something he should hold, and how non
forgiving him will trouble oneself him for the remainder of his life.
Another portion of Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrine has to make with civilization. The following
quotation mark shows how strongly he felt about the manner American people should populate.
& # 8220 ; You start doing money a God. It is all portion of this civilization & # 8230 ; ..The small things I
can obey. But the large things- how we think, what we value- those you must
take yourself. You can & # 8217 ; t allow anyone or any society determine those for you & # 8221 ;
( Albom p.154-155 ) . This quotation mark shows that Morrie does non hold with the manner
many American people live their life. Many let the civilization state them how to populate
their life but his doctrine is that you must be your ain individual and Don & # 8217 ; t allow
anyone else state you how to populate.
Morrie put a batch of accent on what is of import and valuable in his
doctrine of life. One value that he felt really strongly about was that people
expression at material things to judge others alternatively of looking on the interior and acquiring
to cognize them. One quotation mark that supports this statement says how we should non
depend on material things to happen felicity and love. & # 8220 ; They were encompassing
material things and anticipating a kind of clinch back. But it ne’er works. You can & # 8217 ; T
utility stuff things for love or for gradualness or for tenderness or for a
sense of chumminess & # 8221 ; ( Albom p. 125 ) . This quotation mark shows one of Morrie & # 8217 ; s
strongest values, it tells how he felt about money and material points. Morrie felt
that people look to much at what others have and base their friends on money.
You can non turn to autos, money, or sign of the zodiacs to acquire love and be liked by others.
If person is your true friend they will love you for who you are and non what you
Morrie besides had thoughts on the challenges faced by worlds and our homo
nature. He highlighted some of the battles and jobs faced by most
worlds. The undermentioned quotation mark shows how Morrie felt about people establishing their
lives on money alternatively of simple pleasances. & # 8220 ; Morrie had ever been taken with
simple pleasances, vocalizing, express joying, dancing. Now, more than of all time, stuff
things held small or no significance & # 8230 ; We & # 8217 ; ve got a signifier of brainwashing traveling on in
our state & # 8230 ; ..More money is good, more belongings is good, more commerce
is good & # 8230 ; The mean individual is so fogged up by all this, he has no position
on what & # 8217 ; s truly of import anymore & # 8221 ; ( Albom p. 124-125 ) . This quotation mark shows how
Morrie feels about the state and the manner people live. He sees more pleasance
in simple things such as vocalizing and dance, but the American people look at
pleasance as holding more money than person else or more belongings. Morrie
sees this as being a large job in the state today. He feels that people
should be themselves and have fun without looking at how much they own.
To better understand Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrine I will compare and contrast it
with some other doctrines. First, compare the doctrine of Karl Marx to
Morries & # 8217 ; . One point that Marx and Morrie would hold on would likely be
what Marx calls historical determinism. Historical determinism harmonizing to Marx
is how we respond to history in predictable ways. It & # 8217 ; s how we have freewill to
alteration and react to things ( Stevenson p. 140 ) . Morrie would back up this theory
and could utilize the illustration of non forgiving his friend. He had the freewill to
take wether to forgive and how he reacted when his friend died and his
opportunity to forgive him was gone.
The following point Marx makes is that there is no single human nature.
Every action of every human potentially effects others ( Stevenson p. 140 ) .
Morrie would hold by stating that what one individual does can greatly consequence other
people. For illustration how the laughter of other people makes him experience good, but
the sorrow other people have for him and his unwellness makes him experience bad.
Last, Marx says that the largest impact on persons is their work
( Stevenson p. 140 ) . Morrie would besides greatly agree with this because of how he
looks down upon the people who are caught up in material things. He talked a
batch of how worlds are caught up in work, and material things in general.
Morrie and Marx would likely differ on a batch of things and the first
one would be the first point in Marx & # 8217 ; s theory. Marx says that economic science is the
to all history and it’s the manner we understand society and persons. He
goes on to state money and wealth affect us personally and that it & # 8217 ; s our single
human nature. Morrie might hold that this is how society is but he would
disagree that it & # 8217 ; s the manner society should be. As I stated in the paragraph before
Morrie looked down upon those who thought money and material things proved
who you were.
The 2nd doctrine I will compare to Morrie is Jean Paul Sarte.
Sarte & # 8217 ; s chief point is called Aesthetic Extentialism, which has three parts. Morrie
would hold with the first portion which states that we value the person. Every
person is a alone being that has it & # 8217 ; s ain intent in life ( Stevenson p. 170 ) .
Some of Morrie & # 8217 ; s chief points besides province that a person should be valued as
being alone in it & # 8217 ; s ain manner. Another point Sarte makes is that every person
chooses their ain attitudes, intent, values, and manner of life ( Stevenson p. 170 ) .
Morrie would besides greatly agree with this statement. Morrie says that those
people that choose to value the incorrect things in life or take to hold a grumpy
sad attitude are lost in this universe. Morrie believes you should hold a good
attitude, pick a intent in life to assist others every bit good as yourself, and to ever
value immaterial things over material things.
The portion of the doctrine that Sarte and Morrie would differ on would
be on the subject where Sarte denies the being of one truth. Sarte says that
multiple worlds exist, life is absurd, and life doesn & # 8217 ; Ts make any sense
( Stevenson p.175 ) . Morrie would differ with this statement with out a uncertainty.
The statement about life being absurd would truly trouble oneself Morrie. Morrie says to
ever cherish life and populate it to it & # 8217 ; s fullest. Morrie would likely state Sarte was
care foring the incorrect values and was non looking at life in a immaterial manner.
The last doctrine I will compare with Morrie is one of Simone
DeBeavoir. DeBeavoir has five degrees of humaness she uses to look at all types
of people. Every single fits into one of her five classs harmonizing to her.
Morrie would hold with parts of each degree and disagree with parts of the same
degree. So to better compare these two doctrines I will look at each degree and
province which parts Morrie would hold with and which 1s he would differ
The first degree is calls subhuman, which DeBeavoir says is denial of
humaness. The single sees themselves as locked in and that they have small
significance in their ain life ( Zink category notes ) . Morrie would hold that people
are locked into their lives and have no freedom in some cases. He would
besides on the other manus slightly disagree because he would promote these
people and seek to learn them how to take control of their lives.
The 2nd degree is called serious people, which is when people loose
themselves in objectiveness. These types of people believe there is logic behind
everything, they ne’er admit that they can posses a personal value, and they
ne’er inquiry anything ( Zink ) . Morrie would greatly differ with this type of
individual even though he would hold there are a batch of people out at that place like this.
Morrie is a immense protagonist of inquiries. He believes there is ever a inquiry
to be asked and says you can ne’er inquire to many inquiries.
The 3rd degree of humaness is called the nihilist degree. This type of individual
challenges every set of values, accepts nil, and finds mistake with everything.
They are the type of people who overcome everyone and every thought other
people have ( Zink category notes ) . Morrie would hold with this type of individuals
attitude. He would wish that they challenge everything with their ain thoughts and
that they merely don & # 8217 ; t sit back and do whatever person else says. He would besides
disagree with the individuals attitude about desiring to govern everything and that they
would destroy any thoughts that person else had.
The 4th degree harmonizing to DeBeavoir is called the adventurer. The
adventurer is the type of individual who is absorbed in action. This individual will be a
portion of everything that comes along but there will be no significance or content
behind the individuals action. These types of people ever let you know they are
at that place and look to be independent but are truly dependent on the action ( Zink
category notes ) . Morrie would wholly differ with this type of individual. He would
agree with them desiring to be involved with everything but he would desire them
to be echt and set experiencing into their actions.
The last degree is Passionate, which is explained as the individual who is
ever looking for the reply. This type of individual is the individual who ever
wants more, they seek ownerships but are ne’er fulfilled ( Zink ) . Morrie would
privation to assist this individual, he would desire to reply their inquiries and assist them
happen their replies. He would hold with their demand to happen their reply and that
they ever want more, ever acquire the most out of life.
To sum up this paper I agree with Morrie and his position of homo
nature and his doctrine of life. I think you should ever value household and
friends more than material things. You should besides populate life to the it & # 8217 ; s fullest and
portion your ideas with others because you ne’er know when you or the other
individual might non be around any longer. As for adding anything to Morrie & # 8217 ; s thoughts, I
Don & # 8217 ; t think I would. Morrie & # 8217 ; s doctrine would be a good one to populate by and the
chief point to retrieve would be you ne’er know when the individual you care
approximately will be gone. So state them how you feel about them and portion your
cognition with everyone that you can.